FACULTY FOR THE RENEWAL OF PUBLIC EDUCATION: April 22 Open Forum with the Prez

Monday, April 26, 2010

Last week President Bruininks held an open forum to give members of the University community an opportunity to discuss the state of the U with him. This forum was scheduled because his State of the U speech was canceled. A number of FRPE members attended the forum and asked the President some tough questions.

You can view video of the campus forum (in six segments, each about 10 minutes in length, but the quality is not so great--on my player the audio is screwed up but I have a MAC, maybe it will work better on PCs):

http://www.mndaily.com/multimedia/videos/2010/04/23/bruininks-open-forum-part-1

http://www.mndaily.com/multimedia/videos/2010/04/23/bruininks-open-forum-part-2

http://www.mndaily.com/multimedia/videos/2010/04/23/bruininks-open-forum-part-3

http://www.mndaily.com/multimedia/videos/2010/04/23/bruininks-open-forum-part-4

http://www.mndaily.com/multimedia/videos/2010/04/23/bruininks-open-forum-part-5

http://www.mndaily.com/multimedia/videos/2010/04/23/bruininks-open-forum-part-6

The Daily's report on the open forum:

http://www.mndaily.com/2010/04/22/bruininks-holds-open-forum

Bill Gleason's commentary on the open forum, in four parts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tcSBR9XvOs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYj9mEkc0h8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux9iU1aCl3o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQH8h7F4cv8

RECLAIM THE U!

As the administration has come to dominate instead of to serve the university, intellectual and educational values have been displaced by market ones like "efficiency" and "productivity." Faculty and students have been commensurately marginalized in the governance of the institution. We do not say that the university ought to be inefficient or unproductive, but we do demand that values central to scholarly and scientific inquiry and education be restored to the center of the university's endeavors, including (indeed, especially) the management of its finances. Our efforts have a fivefold focus:

1. Governance. The university should be governed by those who carry out its mission of teaching, research, and public service. At present faculty have little meaningful role in making decisions that are handed down from central administration. This state of affairs results from manifold causes, faculty in generations gone by having ceded governance responsibilities to an ever-growing body of administrators. We the faculty must resume our proper role in making, rather than merely reacting to, the decisions that govern our work and our workplace.

2. Transparency in budgeting. The administration should make all information about the university's finances, including expenditures as well as revenue sources, readily available to the public in comprehensible form. At present it is difficult or even impossible to find out how the university spends most of the funds at its disposal, effectively prohibiting people without privileged access and knowledge from scrutinizing the administration's allocation of financial resources. (N.B.: All these resources are public funds once they enter the land-grant institution's coffers.) We recommend an independent audit to open the university's budget to such scrutiny.

3. Accountability for the administration. Every office within central administration should be required to provide to the public an account of what it does, what relation its work bears to the university's mission, and why it costs what it does.

4. Workload. The administration demands greater "productivity" from faculty and staff at the same time that it reduces the resources we need to produce anything and increases the burdens that hamper our work. If resources are withdrawn, our workload must be reduced, not increased. We do not want to do less teaching or less research, rather, we demand that unfunded mandates handed down by the administration be eliminated. Meanwhile, adequate support must be provided to enable efficient and productive work.

5. Integrity of the university. We reject the notion that the university can somehow achieve excellence by cutting programs, faculty positions, and curriculum. All disciplines and all modes of inquiry are interrelated, whether directly or distantly; to excise one element affects others, and ultimately damages the whole. This principle of intellectual integration is encapsulated in the motto of the University of Minnesota, commune vinculum omnibus artibus, which is a phrase derived from the argument of Cicero that the study of poetry is essential to a career in law. To unbind the arts from one another, as if any form of human inquiry can stand in isolation from every other, violates not merely the motto but the principle of the University's existence.

2 comments:

Mr. B.May 3, 2010 at 8:29 AM
The Gospel According to Robert, Part IV.
The Apocalypse

is up on YouTube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQH8h7F4cv8

Wherein the President tap dances around a question from a CLA faculty member about the disconnect between faculty governance and the fact that the administration can and does ignore resolutions approved by the Faculty Senate.
Carlos Humberto Reyes CayotopaAugust 27, 2023 at 5:28 AM
Nice blog thanks for postting

FACULTY FOR THE RENEWAL OF PUBLIC EDUCATION

Monday, April 26, 2010

April 22 Open Forum with the Prez

2 comments:

RECLAIM THE U!

Statcounter

Followers

Blog Archive

Contributors