A PR organist in the AHC has made the following comment on the MinnPost Site:
But we write to take issue with a few of the facts noted in item #7. While we're strong supporters of freedom of expression and opinion for all our employees – cloudy and purposely vague facts require correction.
Characterizing the past 15 years as exhibiting a "remarkable series of ethical and legal scandals" is a slap in the face of the 2,500 faculty who work across the Academic Health Center over a long period of growth and success.
This absurd piece was signed "submitted on behalf of the Academic Health Center administration"
To which I responded:
Characterizing the past 15 years as exhibiting a "remarkable series of ethical and legal scandals" is a slap in the face...
---------WRONG----------
Trying to blow off the fact that the past 15 years HAS been a "remarkable series of ethical and legal scandals" by nitpicking some of the cases is a smokescreen.
I assume you've read Carl Elliot's book? He is one of the co-authors of these ten questions and his book "White Coat, Black Hat: Adventures on the Dark Side of Medicine" is available for purchase at Amazon - http://amzn.to/9Qc0Zw
I also refer you to the following ethical and legal scandal:
U Doctor on Ethics Panel Was Disciplined
http://bit.ly/QnpeF
[And there is PLENTY more where that came from, Mr. Paquette.]
The point I am trying to make is that there is an abundance of evidence out there to back up the author's assertions of a remarkable series of ethical and legal scandals. To claim otherwise is disingenuous at best.
It is a slap in the face of the vast majority of AHC staff, who have acted in ethical and responsible ways, that this administration has been so lax for so long about these matters.
Sincerely,
William B. Gleason Faculty member, College of Medicine U of M grad, 1973
A PR organist in the AHC has made the following comment on the MinnPost Site:
ReplyDeleteBut we write to take issue with a few of the facts noted in item #7. While we're strong supporters of freedom of expression and opinion for all our employees – cloudy and purposely vague facts require correction.
Characterizing the past 15 years as exhibiting a "remarkable series of ethical and legal scandals" is a slap in the face of the 2,500 faculty who work across the Academic Health Center over a long period of growth and success.
This absurd piece was signed "submitted on behalf of the Academic Health Center administration"
To which I responded:
Characterizing the past 15 years as exhibiting a "remarkable series of ethical and legal scandals" is a slap in the face...
---------WRONG----------
Trying to blow off the fact that the past 15 years HAS been a "remarkable series of ethical and legal scandals" by nitpicking some of the cases is a smokescreen.
I assume you've read Carl Elliot's book? He is one of the co-authors of these ten questions and his book "White Coat, Black Hat: Adventures on the Dark Side of Medicine" is available for purchase at Amazon - http://amzn.to/9Qc0Zw
I also refer you to the following ethical and legal scandal:
U Doctor on Ethics Panel Was Disciplined
http://bit.ly/QnpeF
[And there is PLENTY more where that came from, Mr. Paquette.]
The point I am trying to make is that there is an abundance of evidence out there to back up the author's assertions of a remarkable series of ethical and legal scandals. To claim otherwise is disingenuous at best.
It is a slap in the face of the vast majority of AHC staff, who have acted in ethical and responsible ways, that this administration has been so lax for so long about these matters.
Sincerely,
William B. Gleason
Faculty member, College of Medicine
U of M grad, 1973
To which I responded: