tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2464926320516098029.post2560854088956598889..comments2024-01-26T07:57:48.588-08:00Comments on FACULTY FOR THE RENEWAL OF PUBLIC EDUCATION: The logic of "revenue generation": profit-loss statements for facultymadradprofhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08911675406832159788noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2464926320516098029.post-30998962703805891632010-09-12T11:02:50.028-07:002010-09-12T11:02:50.028-07:00I've been harping away for years about this.
...I've been harping away for years about this.<br /><br />The administration refuses to come up with an answer to the question of how much it costs to educate one undergrad per year at the U of M.<br /><br />One can make a deduction - based on statements made by Morrill Hall that may or may not be true - that it costs tuition plus about 15%. The contribution to the U from the state, despite Morrill Hall whining about how pitifully low it is, is about equal to tution. So the expenses of education SEEM to be more than adequately covered. Where does the surplus go and why is it necessary to raise tution? <br /><br />And of course if we are doing so well academically why is the poly sci dept decimated, Bob?Mr. B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02067666077743889680noreply@blogger.com